Wednesday, September 9, 2009
I'm Not There: A Cinematic Representation of the Ambiguity of Truth and Identity
This concept is made most apparent through the musician Jude Quinn (Cate Blanchett). Throughout Jude’s entire storyline, he discusses ambiguity in the way of his motives, sincerity, meaning, etc. In one scene, Mr. Quinn discusses with the British press how people have their own meanings for even the most common of words. A reporter says, “I believe we all know the meaning of “people.”” to which Jude Quinn simply replies, “Do we?” This raises philosophical questions regarding whom which social groups consider considering as equals. If that sounds confusing, stop and think. It is not difficult to understand how such a question reflects upon the time period they are referring to. Keep in mind; this is Vietnam, race riots, Civil Rights Movement, Musical revolution, etc. The idea is that as newgenerations replace the old, mind-sets change, and so do the implied meanings of words that stretch well away from strict dictionary meanings. And it all ties in with Jude Quinn’s final discussion where he explains that mysteries and contradictions are an ever-present evil of the human race that no one should ever separate themselves from. Life is not a formulaic matter and cannot be expressed in such Black & White terms
These exact same examples can be incorporated into another point made by multiple characters. The incorrect idea that anything the media says can be accepted as truth. Jude Quinn makes multiple points concerning media literacy. All of which come together on the stance of anti-commercialization of ideologies. Robbie Clark (Heath Ledger) talks about how “they took away the meaning” when referring to musicians. Ironically, he himself was the acting as Jack Rollins while filming a scene for a movie. This is a simple portrayal of how meaning is lost in the mass-media industry’s pursuit of a buck.
When you take these rather elaborate messages and take them all into consideration, you reach an interesting conclusion that there is no such thing as a single truth or identity. When it comes to any character’s identity, no one really knows who they are, wants people to know who they are, and/or where they stand on moral issues. Mr. B (Richard Gere) hides the fact that he is Billy the Kid. “Woody Guthrie” is not actually Woody Guthrie and doesn’t write songs concerning his views on the issues facing his generation. Of course, there are plenty more. However, the big red flag for the idea is when Arthur (Ben Whishaw) is being questioned by the panel. His character only really comments on the idea of ambiguity in truth and identity. The clincher is the speech on Seven Things to Do When Hiding.
Ultimately, this means that even the title, I’m Not There, literally means, when asked, people cannot have a 100% nailed-down view of themselves and the no amount of political discussion resolves any issue 100%. Now, any one can feel free to say what they want about how this applies to Bob Dylan. The main thing is that there is a deeper issue in the film, one that delves into the human psyche.
Me you and Everyone We Know
The movie "Me, You and Everyone We Know" shows us an ordinary people who connect and interact with each other through unanimated things. Miranda July shows us that people are trying to escape everyday routine by involving there life around objects. For example Christine is living a life she dreams about through her art, creating imaginary relationship that she wishes she had in real life. Same comes to Richard who compares a pair of shoes to the suffering of everyday life when he says “you think you deserve that pain, but you don’t”. More examples are found in the relationship between Robby and the women on the internet, where a little boy can say anything he wants and feel like a grown up man. Same comes to Sylvie’s treasure chest, Rebecca’s and Heathers involvement with an older man through messages on the window. Miranda July shows interactions of those characters through unanimated objects as their escape from reality. This movie shows that in our reality we need some kind of filters to help us to interact with one another.
Also there are many parallels and motifs in the movie which are very important to acknowledge. The scene when Christine is riding in the car with an old man watching last minutes of golden fish life. That shows representation of relationship between an old man and his girlfriend where he couldn’t do anything but be there with her in her last days of life. Yet the most important parallel in the movie is the scene with Richard holding a picture of a bird in his hands. Looking at the real bird sitting on the tree outside his window and the one in his hands there is a representation of Richard’s relationship being chained like the bird in a picture frame. In the end of the movie Christine helps him to let the bird free by placing it in the tree just like the real one. Which symbolizes Richard's chance to let go off his past and start a new relationship.
I'm not there
Apparently the filmmaker was trying to tell the many sides of Bob Dillon when he used different actors to portray different portions of his life - even though some of the actors/portions seemed to crisscross at weird moments. I know Dillon changed up his music styles from time to time as a way of musical growth and that his fans did re-act to this change since they were unprepared for it. Thematically, it was an interesting way to show how people recognize someone as a different person since their physical appearance is different from actor to actor - even though Bob was still Bob inside and throughout the course of the film.
The beginning of the film is as confusing as the beginning of Bob's life. The film starts out with different actors saying different things in Bob's unique dialect, but each have different names. To the viewer, one can only think, 'WTF?'. And right from the start you are lost - except for the fact that the film later has a BBC reporter expose him as who he really is so the world knows who this true rebel is.
As for the arc of the film... well, it ends on the classic, Hollywood upswing - it's just fucking ridiculous. In one scene, he is with his wife and kids and in the next scene we see a later version of himself all happy - except that this happened after his divorce and losing custody of his kids. This film would have improved itself tenfold had it just stuck to a better timeline. You can edit a movie, but you can't edit life.
You and Me and Everyone We Know -- Ricky Leighton
This bleakness is portrayed not only through the characters but the suburban setting itself. The set design in the film is created in order to give everything a distinct feel i.e. the solid colors of Miranda's bedroom or the emptiness of Richards apartment. The shooting strategy is uninteresting also. None of the shots in the film really stood out as being extravagant or extremely complicated. Instead the film relies on the imagery of the birds, the sun setting and suburbia in order to propel this theme.
The only issue is that while trying to portray this "real life" feel to the characters, there is also a quirkiness and absurdity added to all of the situations in the film. In the end, the film had a clear shooting plan and decent set design but the overall message was faulty in it's delivery.
Me and You and Everyone We Know
Me and You and Everyone We Know--Chris Tharp
Me and You and Everyone We Know infuses poetry with everyday life. The characters don’t behave out of the ordinary, their relationships are just abstracted because what they communicate with one another is so truthfully surreal. This surreal postmodern world is very effectively captured throughout the cinematography with the archetypal bright pink of Christine’s stickers and shoes and a number of other possessions. There is one scene in which the editing makes it appear as though Heather and Rebecca will get hit by Christine’s car as they run giddily down the street. Our expectations are set up for this, but ultimately nothing happens to either because they were on two different streets. This functions as a criticism of our propensity to only see the unpleasant and horrifying forces at work when the world is an indifferent place. I interpreted the scenes that contained birds in the film to mean that we are no less simple and free than birds are, we just complicate things for ourselves in this modern world by constructing barriers and shutting one another out.
Me, You, and Everyone We Know
Time as it relate to partnerships is a central theme in Miranda July’s film Me, You, and Everyone We Know. We bounce back and forth between couples that are running out of time, rushing time, or wasting time.
Michael and Ellen are a prime example of running out of time. The two just recently met in their old age, and already their time is being cut short by Ellen’s impending death. Richard ran out of time in his relationship with his ex-wife long before he was ready. The gold fish chase is a metaphor used in the film to accentuate these relationships that are either dead or dying. Michael and Christine try to out run the minutes to give the gold fish a longer life but in the end the answer is the same; you can’t drive at a steady pace on a straight road for your entire life. Eventually you will run out of gas or have to change lanes.
The two teen girls, Heather and Rebecca, are an example of rushing time. This to girls don’t even know how to correctly apply make up and they are already trying to loose there virginity in a threesome with some creep who lives next to the bus they take to go to and from school. The Museum Director is also trying to rush time. The Museum director is so lonely that she is ready to jump head first into a relationship with a guy she knows nothing about other then the fact that he wants to poop back and forth. The metaphor used to demonstrate the rush of time is the last image of the movie; Robby taps the coin on the bus sign and makes the sun move higher in the sky. Yet no matter how many degrees the sun moves, Robbie’s baby smooth face is still what we cut back to. Rushing time changes where you are in life, but not who you are in life.
The main couple, Richard and Christine, is a suburb example of wasting time. They push and pull at each other. “I could just walk you to your car.” Richard says before they split ways. Then when they meet up again moments later “What are you doing in my car! … You don’t even know me.” He has a chance to make something happen, and he pushes her away. Or in the shoe department when Christine lets her mind fill in the conversation Richard has with his Ex-wife. Instead of finding out an answer she flees. The best line in the movie that sums up the relationship between these two is when Christine was on her bed looking at her phone. “ We could spend our whole lives together,” she says “but first you have to call.” The metaphor in this movie that best plays to wasting time is when Christine tries to give her art work to the Museum director in her hand, but the Museum Director tells her to mail it. The assistant director even has the tape in her hand at one point, but gives it back to Christine; why waste the time going the long route when they can handle it frankly by talking to each other and saying what they need out right.
Lesson learned from Me, You, and Everyone We Know: never rush, hold on to, or waste time. Just live your life. Things happen when they happen weather you need them to happen or not.
Me and You and Everyone We Know
Whether said explicitly, found online, or simply implied, the sexual frustration and curiosity featured in all of the relationships leads to the theme of communication playing a large role in the film. Christine hinging on the phone call from Richard, the co-worker being unable to face the teenage girls, and the museum curator are all examples of how people hide behind artificial walls while "living" a superficial life on the outside. While it would be convenient for everyone to just come out and say what they feel, that is rarely the case. Instead we are most often left to decipher ones guided actions and forced to make judgments based on them. Christine for example seems genuinely hurt after Richard kicks her out of the car. This despite the fact that they had just met and she invited herself in. Does this mean that Richard has no feelings for Christine? No, it simply means that the guy didn't want some lady he just met hopping in his car and driving with him. On The amateur videos that Christine creates there seems to be this perfect world where there are no reservations, people feel and they act as so. You have to believe that Christine was hoping for this world when she got in the car. For Richard to understand her personality and they start the long path of love and growing old together. It doesn't go quite this way, but all relationships start somewhere.
Sometimes it's an emoticon, sometimes it's a picture, and sometimes it words, all this goes to show is that there are numerous ways to communicate and express your feelings and at its core, that's what is believe the film is about.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Me and You and Everyone We Know - Sean Mulhearn
Me and You and Everyone We Know develops a steady balance between both the potential depth of various connections between characters and the meticulously constructed barriers that alienate them from one another. Every character in the film experiences some degree of loneliness, whether it be subtle or overwhelming, while at the same time relying heavily on boundaries that offer privacy and comfort.
The struggle between connections and boundaries develops into a significant motif throughout the film, which culminates in the use of intermediaries. In order for these desperate characters to maneuver through their tormenting insecurities they seek out some sort of vehicle to express themselves while somehow maintaining emotional security, if not total anonymity. Perhaps the most obvious example of this is Nancy’s insistence that Christine mail her the tape of her artwork rather than simply handing it directly to Nancy. Other examples abound, though, including the sexual descriptions left behind by the co-worker and Peter being blindfolded while receiving oral sex.
While this motif is apparent, it is only framed properly with the inclusion of the main character, Christine. Not only is Christine vital to the overall trajectory of the film as the main character, she helps shape the other characters with her own ignorance of inhibitions and sincerity. Christine constantly, albeit innocently, tests other characters’ boundaries, such as the tape with Nancy, the picture frame with Pam, or getting into Richard’s car without permission
Me And You And Everyone We Know-Mike Curcio
Michael Curcio
Me And You And Everyone We Know
The film, “Me And You And Everyone We Know” deals expertly with relationships between people, both romantic and platonic, without creating an overbearing sense of drama between the subjects. The result is a movie that relates to human emotion but doesn’t fully capture it and because Miranda July walks that fine line in her writing, the audience benefits by not having their intelligence insulted. July urges the viewers to relate with the characters and empathize with the characters by filling in their lack of human emotion in the film with the viewer’s own feelings from personal experiences. Some viewers may find it frustrating that John Hawke’s character can’t seem to simply squeeze out his true emotions in hopes of allowing some closure in his divorce. Others might see his emotional retardation with both his ex-wife and his other “love” interest -Miranda July’s character Christine- and relate because they too have felt their communication skills to be lacking in their own life so they feel relieved and empowered to share their pain with other person even if that person may be fictional.
Miranda July made this picture to communicate with the audience about the side of themselves that they don’t openly allow others to see. Ms. July understands that when the emotional introvert expresses his or her emotions; beautiful and awkward situations occur. One of these situations is towards the end of the film when Robby, after an entire film of wondering, finally discovers what the noise is that constantly wakes him up in the morning. He takes that quarter that the businessman is using to tap against the metal rail and then the young boy starts tapping the metal himself, slowly taking over the unofficial responsibility of the man as being his proverbial morning rooster. This moment is exclusive to Robby, but any member of the audience that has had a similar experience could relate to the boy and they could share the moment together. The aforementioned experience is what makes this film fleetingly sentimental yet highly effective in warming the human heart.
Me and You and Everyone We Know - Dan Janavey
Me and You and Everyone We Know is, quite literally, about Me and You and Everyone We Know or, speaking in broader strokes, the interconnectivity between people and relationships that fuels society. Every major character in the (rather large) cast of the film is connected to every other character in some way, either directly or through their interactions with another character. For example Richard and the two teenage girls share concurrent stories involving love, and though the characters never truly meet in the film (except perhaps, very briefly) there are both connected through Richard’s coworker and thus the comparison between their stories becomes more apparent.
Also important to note is the presence of similar motifs and themes running through each individual character’s stories. The idea of being “wounded,” either physically or emotionally is an important part of each character’s story and and, again, serves to link them all together through one common thread. This motif is symbolized physically onscreen by Richard’s burnt hand and the bandage he keeps it under throughout the course of the film, only removing it at the end of the film when his emotional wound (his pain regarding his wife’s divorcing him) has been healed as well.
Indeed, each major character in the film suffers from some kind of wound. Christine is wounded by Richard’s initial refusal of her due to his own trauma from the divorce. Peter and Robby, Richard’s children, are themselves wounded by their parent’s separation. The museum’s curator, wounded by her own loneliness finds solace in both Christine’s work and her cybersex chats with Peter and Robby. In this way every other character in the film finds some kind of respite from their wounds in the arms of another character.
Katie McMeans Me&You&Everybody We Know
Miranda July’s Me and You and Everyone We Know centers around seemingly every day people and their struggle to form relationships through various barriers. Throughout the film, technology plays a huge role in both strengthening and blocking relationships. For Christine and Richard, technology could be argued to hamper their relationship. Their first meetings are honest, pure. They say what they mean and don’t waste time. They use the metaphor of their walk down the block as a way to express what both of them are actually hoping for. However, it is when Christine must rely on Richard’s phone call that the progress of their relationship is hindered. At one point Christine exclaims “Why won’t you call!? We have our entire lives to live! But you have to fucking call!”
Contrasting this however, when Christine attempts to meet with Nancy the art dealer face to face she makes no success. It is only when Christine uses her medium and the video camera to reach out to Nancy does she listen, letting Christine know through technology by calling her and saying “Macaroni.” Nancy’s relationship with Robby as well, is only successful through technology, through the Internet. When they meet in the flesh it is obvious that Nancy’s fantasies can only be lived online.
The imagery of birds is used throughout the film as a way to show Miranda July’s wish for how relationships should be. The cliché “free as a bird” would be an obvious correlation to make. By book ending the film with this bird imagery, we are shown that the characters are able to free themselves from the barriers of their relationships.
One can pass the time by doing any number of things; creating art, going on a long drive, doing something that they love, sleep, being a chauffeur for the elderly, or chatting online to strangers about pooping back and forth. There is anything and everything to pass the time.
Time is one of those interesting topics, where it can go in any direction because no one can explain it. Time is undetermined by mankind, but determined by however one decides to spend it. In order for a relationship to work or not work, both individuals have to enjoy spending time together. In Richard's case, him and his ex wife were obviously not enjoying being together which in time led to their separation. However, at the end of the film and after all the awkward interactions, Richard's timing was perfect in asking out one of the other main characters, Christine. I do not even think either one of them greeted one another and exchanged names their names throughout the whole film. And that is just one example of the ridiculously odd material in this movie.
Monday, September 7, 2009
Me, You, and Everyone We Know
It was not a beautiful film, but it only existed to broadcast the message of imperfect humans needing to feel like they’re perfect. You could never love somebody face to face. You just couldn’t. For one reason or another, you were never really able to look somebody in the eye: you had to look through a mirror, talk through a cell phone, or be seen on a video in order to expose your soul to someone. When the flaws of loveless humans came into view (losing the boys, the fish on the car, or yelling at Miranda’s character to get out of the car), the editing sets a faster pace, and even the soundtrack of the movie seems to disturb you in a way. What I liked about the movie is that it didn’t ask why things were the way they were, but it showed envy to things that can: the portrait of the bird. It’s a feeling of freedom that seems to shake each character in the same way: I wish I could be free to do what I feel.
The issue of hiding oneself is evident in the film. For one, the relationship Richard has with his children, Robbie and Peter, lacks communication. They only express their feelings to him by singing a hymn. They channel this need for communication through music. Richard's coworker exemplifies this, also. His deepest desires involving the two teenage girls would be seen as taboo by society, so he writes them dirty messages on his window. And even Peter and Robbie's obsession with internet chats supports the notion of concealment, showing us that technology can be utilized as a front. Peter even tells Robbie that it could be a man on the other end. This is why it's a shock when we find out that the art director, Nancy, is the creep chatting with them. She hides this sick and twisted persona behind the computer screen. Miranda July's character, Christine, is the only character who wishes people would express their feelings. She lives vicariously through other people's photos in her performance art. Because of her odd personality, she doesn't fit into society as well as the others and comes off a bit strong for Richard. She is actually the most sane one, almost serving as the other characters' conscience, reminding them to live life to its fullest and say what you mean.
The motif of birds is consistent throughout the film, as well. Perhaps July wanted to use it as a way to show the characters' deepest desire to break free from their burdens of everyday life (i.e. the bird is carefree and without restrictions). And finally, the final scene of the film offers great insight into the meaning of the film. When Robbie discovers that the noise he's been hearing every morning is a man tapping a quarter against a pole, he contradicts what Richard says earlier in the film about children not having any control over their lives. Robbie taps the quarter and believes he's controlling the sunrise by doing so, which defies what his father said.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Miranda July’s film Me and You and Everyone We Know seems to be about people who are looking for meaning in life while trying to pass the time. Before the opening credits are played in the film, Richard, who is recently separated from his wife, decides there should be some type of ceremony for his sons, so he pours lighter fluid on his hands and lights it in front of his sons’ window and ends up severely burning himself. A great deal of the film focuses on Christine and her performance art, which seems to be an avid hobby of hers as well as a search for an idealistic vision of love. The close ups used of her performance art help the audience to enter Christine’s world.
The secondary characters in the story also seem to do be doing something to pass the time, whether it’s Nancy thinking she’s talking to a potential mate on the internet or Heather and Rebecca who are beginning to explore their blossoming sexuality. There is a great moment when Heather and Rebecca take turns performing oral sex on Peter and the camera shows Peter looking at a picture of his family when his parents were still together. It seems to convey a sense of loss of innocence.
The final scene of the film is especially poignant. Robbie is awake early to hear what the clicking from the outside is and sees a man waiting for the bus, banging a coin on a sign. He claims he’s just “passing the time” and hands the coin over to Robbie who imitates his clicking. The sunrise and this line seem to convey it’s a new day and everyone is just trying to get by.
The interactions between Robby and Nancy seem to be a more direct approach to the subject matter as they are conversing via the internet. Through this you get a more candid view of these two people. The idea of pooping back in forth if said in a casual encounter in a bar or some more conventional social meeting would be unthinkable. But because of the anonymity this sort of interaction entails it frees people up to say things that they never would have said in any other circumstances. It is a double sided idea in this case. On one side you have a small child who seems to not quite understand what he is saying. But on the other hand you have a grown woman who seems to be expressing some sort of secret sexual fetish that she never would have confided in anyone else without this type of communication. Whether or not this is a positive or a negative seems less clear. But it does seem that Miranda July sees some sort of strange beauty in this sort of relationship.
Another thread in this story that shares this theme is the relationship between Heather and Rebecca, the teenage girls, and Andrew, the shoe salesmen friend of Richard. When these characters first meet Andrew refuses to say what he would do with the girls sexually because of the nature of the interaction. It is too direct and confrontational. So in the style of his time he writes it on pieces of paper and posts them on his window. This is the same idea as in the relationship between Robby and Nancy. Andrew can only say these sort of taboo sexual things to these young girls through a non confrontational medium. These are things he might in a regular social interaction think about but never really say, but because he can not be seen paired with these words, in his mind, he is more comfortable saying them. Of course when the girls finally knock on his door to come and lose their virginity to him he immediately drops to the floor and hides. Miranda July seems to be saying that maybe it is better for us not to act on these sort of animalistic impulses because perhaps that’s all they are, dirty, private, fleeting impulses.